Tag Archives: computing

The Keyboard

Being a ‘TV Typewriter’ and all, it goes without saying that the keyboard is a rather important component of the thing.  No matter how well you design the electronics, they’re useless unless you have a physical means to input data.  And new keyboards in 1973 were expensive.  Unless, of course, you read Radio Electronics for tips on how to get around that problem.

Not that the TVT required an actual keyboard.  In the September 1973 Radio Electronics article, Don Lancaster suggested ‘six switches and a pushbutton’ would suffice.  Entering letters was a matter of setting the switches and pressing the button.  Don claimed with practice decent speed could be achieved, although I think he must have been a pianist to make that arrangement work with any proficiency.  Another option was the ‘low cost keyboard’ project offered in the February 1973 issue of RE.  Part of Don’s ingenuity was finding extremely affordable ways of doing things; his handmade key switches were crude but brilliant, although you still needed to secure keycaps from somewhere.  RE suggested ‘two shot’ moulded plastic keytops made by a company called Mechanical Enterprises of Arlington, Virginia.  I have no idea if they still exist.  The keytops themselves look pretty close to those found on IBM Selectric typewriters, except for extra functions printed over the letters.   You also needed to build your own ASCII encoder which would convert the signals generated into letters and numbers that would appear on your screen.

My first order of business in choosing to model Don’s prototype was to find out what kind of keyboard he used.  To refresh, here’s what the prototype keyboard looks like:

Link: Computer History Museum, Mountain View, CA

When I asked him about it, his response was that the keyboard was an ‘IBM EBCDIC’ surplus unit.  They had taken apart dozens of them and reconfigured into just over 40 complete units that were then offered to TVT builders.   I tried to google search using what he had given me but came up short; EBCDIC, which stands for Extended Binary Coded Decimal Interchange Code, like ASCII, was an encoding standard used my several keyboard manufacturers, not a specific model.   I asked in forums, on mailing lists.   Some claimed familiarity, but could only suggest they were ‘key to tape’ units.  One day I got an old school computer hobbyist who remembered something about the TVT prototype using surplus Mohawk ‘key to tape’ keyboards.  Again I went to Captain Google, and again he came up short.   All I had were photos of the prototype.

I realized I needed a Plan B, because finding anything involving key to tape or punch cards from 1973 today might prove to be impossible.  I thought perhaps I could recreate the keytops on the prototype by finding parts that were close and fashioning something that resembled them.  The underlying switches wouldn’t matter; they wouldn’t be seen.  Since the keytops looked kind of like teletype keys, I did some ebaying around for ‘teletype keys’, and one day came up lucky.  A vendor had 62 ‘Repeat’ replacement keys for military teletypes.  Apart from every one having ‘REPT’ stamped on it, they looked pretty close to what Don’s prototype had.  I figured making them look like the prototype would just be a matter of painting them.  So I ordered all of them.  Here’s what they looked like:

20150923_205221

If you look at the photo of the actual TVT prototype keyboard again, you’ll see these cylinders are set in the lower right corner of black square surrounds that are there to hide the switches underneath.  I assumed (incorrectly) that cylindrical keys slid down through the surrounds when pressed.  Thanks to my years of model railroading, I had learned how to cast plastic parts using two part resin.  I reasoned I could approximate the dimensions of these surrounds, create a mockup of one in styrene, and then make a mould of it and cast it.  Then I could adapt the ‘low cost keyboard’ project from the earlier RE article to it, creating a working keyboard that at least had the same exterior look.

I had that all settled up and began making plans, but then one day I had a stroke of luck and ebay coughed up just what I needed.  While searching for ‘Mohawk keyboard’, sure enough, one came up.  It looked just like this:

From ebay

After close inspection it became very clear this keyboard was what Don had used!  The placement and design of the keys were correct, the only difference being colour.  Woohoo!   This was it: an original Mohawk Data Sciences (MDS) key to tape system keyboard.

My understanding is that key-to-tape was a system that avoided the need to punch data into paper cards.  MDS apparently did very well for a time,  up until about the late 1970s.  I don’t know for sure what happened to them but I imagined it was the same fate as many other proprietary computer brands as the world slowly converged into widely held standards.  Many old hands refer to them as ‘IBM Mohawk’, but I see nothing to indicate IBM’s involvement anywhere at the time these key to tape systems were being produced.  Perhaps someone can clarify.

My elation at finally locating it was was stopped cold by the asking price, though: a cool $600.   I asked around on forums for opinions; even though the price was extremely steep, I reckoned the odds of coming across another unit like this any time soon were slim to none.  I was assured that these keyboards were nothing special — just salvage from old Mohawk key to tape units that had once been plentiful.  Most said they wouldn’t offer more than $50.  I asked the seller if they’d consider offers.  They declined, but eventually relisted for $100.   I opted to sit out, hoping it would go unsold and be marked down again, but it sold for just over $100.   I felt a little bummed — I knew these keyboards didn’t come up every day, and since the sellers themselves didn’t know what they were, searching them out on ebay would require hours of looking up every keyboard in the Vintage Computing section.  Who knows when I might see one again?  But then a year later, I did!  The asking price this time was $100 and I went for it.  Here it is:

Mohawk MDS Key to tape keyboard
Mohawk MDS Key to tape keyboard

Interestingly, it’s not exactly the same as the first one I encountered.  There are fewer switches up top, and the keys are coloured differently.  I’m guessing Mohawk customized these things depending on client and application.  Perhaps someone could shed some light on that.    The keyboard itself isn’t all that big, maybe about 18 inches wide, but man is it heavy.  You know those ‘steelie’ IBM clicky keyboards?  They have nothing on this beast.  Here’s a few shots around it:

20150922_204558

20150922_204645

20150922_204659

20150922_204754

20150922_205400

Way cool.  There are five screws to remove to get into it, and upon removing the case we are presented with the innards:

20150922_205618

The keys themselves sit a good few inches up from the base.  Compared to modern keyboards, the space inside is cavernous.

20150922_205623

20150922_205653

I was surprised to find a speaker in there.  I’m assuming that was there to alert to errors and so on.  The wire bundle looks pretty intimidating given how many there are.  Keeping all that straight looks to be a challenge.  In terms of operation, I was expecting a much more mechanical, clunky feel to them as several forum folks had said these key to tape units were a nightmare to type on (I actually found pressing the keys to be relatively smooth, although a bit awkward with the small size and wide spacing).  The switches themselves I *think* are faily simple contact switches — two wires each, press it down and the circuit is connected.     I’m hoping Don chose these for relative simplicity.  I was also wrong about how they operate — when you press on the cylinders, the entire thing, surround included, moves down.  The switch mechanism itself below the keytops seem massive for what they are.

You can see in this side profile view the solid blocks installed as spacers.  On my keyboard there is a single rectangular ‘LF’ key on the right side.  This key does not exist on the first ebay keyboard I came across; rather it is blocked off.

20150922_205633

According to Don, he cherry picked blue, red and black keytops from various keyboards for colour, and reassembled them to get the patterns seen in the prototype.   Based on what we can see here, it looks like before or after changing/painting keycaps, he removed some keys on the right side and blocked them in, dropped the whole keyboard into his TVT prototype case, and then to center it and hide the metal framing he used to mount it, added a vertical column of blocks on the left side, making it one column wider than it was originally.  Neat!  I don’t have enough ‘blocks’ to fill in the keys I will have to remove, but those should be easy enough to cast in resin and paint.

To be honest, I’m almost a little hesitant to take this apart.  The forum gurus say these units aren’t rare or collectible, but I’ve never seen one myself before and they can’t be that numerous after 40+ years.  It’s just a neat thing to look at and appreciate how much keyboards generally have evolved over the years.  The thought of painting over the original decaling is perhaps just a bit bothersome to me.  I’m sure I’ll get over it, but for now, until we get to the actual construction phase, I’ll enjoy it as is.

Next up, the ICs.

 

TV Typewriter Redux

Don Lancaster’s TV Typewriter prototype, courtesy of the Computer History Museum, Mountain View, CA.

I’ve been an old computer collector for as long as I can remember. Even before they were old, they were unique – unique in look, unique in personality, unique in how they operated. In the early 1990s as it became clear the world was converging around the PC standard and computers were destined to become generic beige (later black) boxes; that and a little bit of nostalgia for my misspent youth prompted me to seek a few tokens of a disappearing age. In high school I remember the retirement of my school business office’s Commodore PETs, and asking if I might buy one. The PET had been the very first computer I had ever interacted with, as a Grade 1 student. It had been the computer I begged Santa for one Christmas (he responded with a VIC-20).

Anyway, back at the school, a teacher was piqued by my interest in those old Commodores, and was kind enough to secure one for me, free, fantastically enough. A SuperPET, with 8050 drive! A hobby (or more accurately: addiction) was born. I felt like that enthralled 6 year old again. Finally, a PET was mine!

For a good chunk of my early collecting days I had no idea what was really out there. Having been born in the mid-70s, I completely missed some of the earliest experimenting in home computing. My world was Atari, Commodore, IBM and so on.

That world was expanded considerably when the world wide web, and particularly Ebay came along. For the first time I found out that Commodore had produced something other than the PET, VIC-20, 64 and Amiga. I learned to my amazement of the TED series of machines, the C16 and Plus/4. The more I learned the more I wanted to learn. Collecting was made (relatively) easy by Ebay; you didn’t have to chance upon this stuff at a flea market or luck out at an estate sale. You just had to plug in the name of what you were looking for and, poof, there it was (or wasn’t)! It became a hobby in itself to learn about a new system and see if it was available for sale there.

But I digress.

Like I said, my world was the mainstream 8-bit stuff, like Commodore. Apple 1? What’s that? Mark-8? Is that a car? Altair? Never heard of her. I knew nothing of these and countless other efforts by early computing pioneers to break into the impenetrable fortress known as the Home.

Not that computers weren’t available if you really wanted one back then. They were just really expensive and of course the further back in time you go, the bigger a (ware)house you needed. In the early-to-mid 70s, most people had no practical use for a home computer. If they needed to do research, they picked up a book. If they needed entertainment, they hit the theatre. If they needed to type an essay, they had the trusty typewriter.

Some eager engineers had tried and failed (hard) to persuade people of the computer’s usefulness in the home – Honeywell with their hilarious Kitchen Computer springs to mind. Because you know, girls just wanna have fun (programming recipes in octal).

Between that apathy and the phenomenal cost of hardware, there seemed little chance for home computing. Enter Don Lancaster.

Cover of Radio Electronics September 1973 issue, featuring the TV Typewriter project (link: Matt Holley’s SWTPC.COM)

Don Lancaster was a talented engineer working for Goodyear Aerospace in the early 70s. He designed — not a computer, per se, but a thing he called a ‘TV Typewriter’. Don realized that one didn’t need to go out and purchase an ultra expensive video monitor to put text onscreen – in fact, most houses already had a monitor of sorts: their TV. The TV Typewriter would make use of what was already there and open the door to a flood of possibilities: “A super sales promoter! A calculator! A 32 register, 16 place serial computer!” Few of these would actually be realized, but the concept was critical in laying down the foundations of the 8 bit home computing revolution.

It didn’t have a CPU and could not be programmed. It couldn’t even allow you to do basic addition and subtraction like a calculator. Basically, it did exactly (and barely) what was advertised – it let you type stuff on your TV.

It was not a project for the faint of heart – although not nearly as expensive as a proper terminal of the day, it still cost some money and required some serious electronics assembly skills. Don’s prototype was a bargain basement as you got: a wood case covered in upholstery vinyl and a ‘surplus’ keyboard from a key-to-tape machine rejiggered for his purposes. The whole thing had a distinctly homespun feel. I soon realized, I had to have one!

But it was not to be. After years of searching I realized that with fewer than a couple hundred ‘kits’ sent out in total (Southwest Technical Products, an early computing pioneer, partnered with RE and offered a set of pre-fabbed boards the hobbyist could build a TVT from), many unsuccessfully built and likely tossed in the garbage (not to mentiom the passage of 40 years), there was little chance of my finding one online. The closest I ever got was a still pretty rare TV Typewriter II, which was a later design by Ed Colle that was a bit more packaged than the original. I’m really proud of that piece and look at it often, even though it no longer works correctly. (Update: it has been repaired!)

Digression again. So yeah, after concluding I would never likely come across an actual vintage ‘TV Typewriter’ in the wild, I realized, hey, I can do it myself! After all, that’s how it was done back in the day. And thus began my quest to create, from scratch, a recreation of the TV Typewriter. And since I’m recreating, why not make a replica of the original prototype? That would definitely attract some attention at vintage computing festivals!

I knew I would be able to find many of the correct vintage chips, some even period correct, with enough looking online. The boards could be recreated using copies of the artwork originally produced in the construction details booklet RE provided to readers for a fee. I fell in love with the whole idea the more I thought about this potential project – both as a means to acquire something that cannot be acquired, but also to go back in time, into the world of the early computing hobbyist and learn and invent just as they did. Even if I never got the thing to function (and that’s a strong probability; I’m a computer guy but I’m no engineer), at least I’d have it in my collection to show off. And anyway, lots of TVT builders in the day failed too. Failure is just as authentic as success!

The blog that follows will chronicle my efforts to build a ‘new’ TVT, a replica based on Don Lancaster’s original prototype. Get ready to giggle. This computer guy is about to get old-schooled.